<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Match Winks: an Overview</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.onlinedatingmatchmaker.com/match-winks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.onlinedatingmatchmaker.com/match-winks/</link>
	<description>Online Dating Advice</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 20:28:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: russruggles</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinedatingmatchmaker.com/match-winks/comment-page-1/#comment-4805</link>
		<dc:creator>russruggles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 23:56:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinedatingmatchmaker.com/?p=110#comment-4805</guid>
		<description>It sounds like it worked for you - I&#039;m glad to hear it! Thanks for sharing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It sounds like it worked for you &#8211; I&#8217;m glad to hear it! Thanks for sharing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian B</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinedatingmatchmaker.com/match-winks/comment-page-1/#comment-4804</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 20:50:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinedatingmatchmaker.com/?p=110#comment-4804</guid>
		<description>I did teh Shuffle and got two winks the next day. Very cool tip!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did teh Shuffle and got two winks the next day. Very cool tip!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian B</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinedatingmatchmaker.com/match-winks/comment-page-1/#comment-4799</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 06:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinedatingmatchmaker.com/?p=110#comment-4799</guid>
		<description>I agree that winking is lame. Get some balls. But wasting time on long emails doesn&#039;t work either. I like your idea of a hook. One sentence to get some interest. Quick, but effective to find out if she wants to talk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that winking is lame. Get some balls. But wasting time on long emails doesn&#8217;t work either. I like your idea of a hook. One sentence to get some interest. Quick, but effective to find out if she wants to talk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: russruggles</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinedatingmatchmaker.com/match-winks/comment-page-1/#comment-3115</link>
		<dc:creator>russruggles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 17:56:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinedatingmatchmaker.com/?p=110#comment-3115</guid>
		<description>Tony, it&#039;s pretty widely accepted that women prefer messages. So much so that Match.com says right in their emails &quot;women prefer messages.&quot;

I&#039;m not big on sending messages to women who have shown no interest either. That&#039;s why I recommend the &quot;Who&#039;s Viewed Me Shuffle.&quot; If a woman has looked at your profile, that is a small expression of interest.

It&#039;s my stance that *winking* is pathetically unagressive; and *strategic* first contact through messages is the way to go. Have you had success otherwise? Please share.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tony, it&#8217;s pretty widely accepted that women prefer messages. So much so that Match.com says right in their emails &#8220;women prefer messages.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not big on sending messages to women who have shown no interest either. That&#8217;s why I recommend the &#8220;Who&#8217;s Viewed Me Shuffle.&#8221; If a woman has looked at your profile, that is a small expression of interest.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s my stance that *winking* is pathetically unagressive; and *strategic* first contact through messages is the way to go. Have you had success otherwise? Please share.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinedatingmatchmaker.com/match-winks/comment-page-1/#comment-3114</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 17:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinedatingmatchmaker.com/?p=110#comment-3114</guid>
		<description>Ugh, there is more then one way to do things. If you ask me, I&#039;d say that waiting for women to wink at you is pathetically un aggressive.

I&#039;d also say that investing more then 10 minutes a day in composing messages to women whom have shown you no interest is a foolhardy endeavor, thus the wink.

It allows to gauge if there is any possibility that she might be interested so you don&#039;t waste your time composing a well thought out message that will just be deleted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ugh, there is more then one way to do things. If you ask me, I&#8217;d say that waiting for women to wink at you is pathetically un aggressive.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d also say that investing more then 10 minutes a day in composing messages to women whom have shown you no interest is a foolhardy endeavor, thus the wink.</p>
<p>It allows to gauge if there is any possibility that she might be interested so you don&#8217;t waste your time composing a well thought out message that will just be deleted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
